INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Where the [Claimant] has made sufficiently long use of a particularly distinctive device mark, a special obligation is cast on the competitor to avoid confusion. April 20, 2021April 20, 2021 admin_lawsdelhi This content is restricted to site members. If you are an existing user, please log in. New users may register below.Existing Users Log InUsername or EmailPassword Remember Me Forgot password? Click here to resetNew User? Click here to register Related Posts INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Dr Reddy’s Laboratories (DRL) against the makers of a feature film called ‘Haathi Mere Saathi’ HELD “registration of the trade mark in one class cannot, by itself, give [DRL] an unrestricted right or monopoly over the letters D, R and L, when used in that order.” April 21, 2021April 21, 2021 admin_lawsdelhi INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ZYCLEAR, sued Uniza over their apprehended use of the trade mark ZACLEAR . Gujarat based companies slugging in Delhi HC . Rejection of plaint motion moved by Uniza against Cadila, dismissed April 20, 2021 admin_lawsdelhi
