Delhi High Court Judgements

81130 Judgements Hosted as on 24/08/2023 SEARCH (FREE) READ DOWNLOAD

BANKING & FINANCE

Delhi HC restrains banks from taking any coercive action against a corporate entity for default in payment for Factoring Facility HELD While prima facie observing that Factoring Facility offered by banks was at par with loans and advances and would thus be covered by the RBI Circulars for benefit of borrowers during COVID-19, the Delhi High Court has restrained banks from taking any coercive action against a corporate entity for default in payment for the bank’s Factoring Facility

admin_lawsdelhi Apr 29, 2020 0 Comments

Delhi HC restrains banks from taking any coercive action against a corporate entity for default in payment for Factoring Facility Aditi Singh Apr 29, 2020, 3:43 PM IST While prima facie…

BANKING & FINANCE

Delhi HC restrains IOCL from invoking/encashing bank guarantees furnished by Punj Lloyd Limited HELD ..till the expiry of period of one week from the lifting of the lockdown, imposed by the Central Government, consequent to COVID-2019 pandemic, the IOCL shall remain injuncted from encashing/invoking the aforesaid three bank guarantees, It, nonetheless, directed that there shall be an ad-interim injunction against IOCL, restraining it from encashing the bank guarantees which are yet to be invoked.

admin_lawsdelhi Apr 24, 2020 0 Comments

Delhi HC restrains IOCL from invoking/encashing bank guarantees furnished by Punj Lloyd Limited Aditi Singh Apr 24, 2020, 2:23 PM IST The Delhi High Court has restrained Indian Oil Corporation Ltd from…

BANKING & FINANCE

Indiabulls Moves Delhi HC Against SIDBI, Says Loan Installments Can’t Be Demanded In Light of Moratorium Imposed by RBI HELD disposed off the petition by clarifying that SIDBI will not raise any further demand on the Petitioner towards the due installments against it till it obtains a clarification from RBI.

admin_lawsdelhi Apr 11, 2020 0 Comments

Indiabulls Moves Delhi HC Against SIDBI, Says Loan Installments Can't Be Demanded In Light of Moratorium Imposed by RBI Karan Tripathi 10 April 2020 12:35 PM Indiabulls Commercial Credit Limited…

BANKING & FINANCE

DIVISION BENCH :: Delhi HC Allows Interim Reoccupation To Debtor of Property Securitized By Bank, Due To Nationwide Lockdown HELD not so comply with the undertaking, the respondent shall be entitled to take all steps in continuation of the earlier action under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act for removing the petitioner, his wife and children from the said first floor and to use reasonable force for the said purpose and / or to initiate proceedings for breach of undertaking given to the Court by the petitioner and his wife.’

admin_lawsdelhi Apr 11, 2020 0 Comments

Delhi HC Allows Interim Reoccupation To Debtor of Property Securitized By Bank, Due To Nationwide Lockdown Karan Tripathi 10 April 2020 2:23 PM Delhi High Court has allowed a family…

ARBITRATION

DIVISION BENCH : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Section 34, Section 34(2A), Section 37 HELD if the court finds that a conclusion or inference drawn by the Arbitral Tribunal, even if upheld in proceedings under section 34, is not supported by a plain, objective and clear-eyed reading of documents, this court would not flinch in correcting such conclusion or inference, especially if it goes to the root of the matter. Single Judge has therefore committed error in the proceedings under section 34, which are amenable to be corrected in the present proceedings under section 37. Award set aside.

admin_lawsdelhi Apr 9, 2020 0 Comments

DELHI HIGH COURT DIVISION BENCH MMTC LIMITED — Appellant Vs. ANGLO AMERICAN METALLURGICAL COAL PTY LTD — Respondent ( Before : G.S. Sistani and Anup Jairam Bhambhani, JJ. ) First…

CONTEMPT

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) – Section 151 Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 – Section 11, Section 12 HELD on each occasion it was only Mr.Ankur Jain and/his counsel who had given/reiterated the undertaking to this Court given by Mr.Ankur Jain and that his aged mother and his sister had only filed affidavits supporting to application CM APPL No.30665/2018, which application was, primarily, for extension of time to comply with order dated 18.07.2018. Hence, Mr. Ankur Jain is guilty of contempt.

admin_lawsdelhi Apr 9, 2020 0 Comments

DELHI HIGH COURT SINGLE BENCH SCINDIA POTTERIES & SERVICS PVT. LTD. — Appellant Vs. ANKUR JAIN AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Yogesh Khanna, J. ) Contempt Case (C)…

Next Page »

You Missed

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Evidence By Way Of Affidavit Not Mandatory When Documentary Evidence Sufficient For Determining Well-Known Status Of Trademark

DIRECT TAXATION MUNICIPAL LAWS

DB – services rendered by advocates are professional activities, and, therefore, they cannot be levied with taxes under the “commercial establishment” category

ACCIDENT COMPENSATION RAILWAYS

Inquest proceedings were conducted around 8:55 am on 05.01.2017, which mentions the recovery of a journey ticket dated 04.01.2017 — Mere delay in noticing and reporting the incident by a third party ought to have been appreciated in light of the fact that the incident statedly took place in the month of January – Matter remanded to tribunal for grant of compensation

C P C EVIDENCE ACT

DB – Defamation — Nowhere in the pleadings or in the evidence did the appellant or its witnesses state that the amounts were not due — Respondent’s assertion of there being outstanding amounts which had not been paid by the appellant Company cannot be termed to be false or per se defamatory.