Delhi High Court Judgements

105273 Judgements Hosted as on 19/05/2023 SEARCH (FREE) READ DOWNLOAD

Cr P C

Petition u/s 482 Crpc – Legality of the Interim Order passed Magistrate continuing custody of three minor children with the Respondent (Husband), with visitation rights to Petitioner (wife), HELD alternate remedy of a Statutory Appeal under 29 DV Act available. Dismissed DOD 20.7.202

admin_lawsdelhi Apr 17, 2021 0 Comments

Petition u/s 482 Crpc - Legality of the Interim Order passed Magistrate continuing custody of three minor children with the Respondent (Husband), with visitation rights to Petitioner (wife), HELD alternate…

Cr P C

ISHRAT JAHAN case: HELD Public Prosecutor had moved an application, for extension of time to file chargesheet, after going through the whole matrix of the case and after satisfying himself as per the law as enumerated in the second limb of Section 43(D)(2)(b) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. Ld trial Judge also after going through the facts and circumstances and mandate of provisions of law of the Act mentioned and after recording his satisfaction had passed impugned order. Therefore, Court is of view that there is no illegality or perversity in the said order.

admin_lawsdelhi Jul 31, 2020 0 Comments

ISHRAT JAHAN case: HELD Public Prosecutor had moved an application, for extension of time to file chargesheet, after going through the whole matrix of the case and after satisfying himself…

Cr P C

Petition u/s 482 Crpc – Legality of the Interim Order passed Magistrate continuing custody of three minor children with the Respondent (Husband), with visitation rights to Petitioner (wife), HELD alternate remedy of a Statutory Appeal under 29 PWDV Act available. Dismissed DOD 20.7.202

admin_lawsdelhi Jul 21, 2020 0 Comments

Petition u/s 482 Crpc - Legality of the Interim Order passed Magistrate continuing custody of three minor children with the Respondent (Husband), with visitation rights to Petitioner (wife), HELD alternate…

Cr P C

Settlement between accused and complainant. Quashing of FIR. HELD case registered under Sections 420 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 though the aspect of the settlement between the petitioner and the complainant may be considered by the learned Trial Court as a mitigating circumstance at the final stage. DISMISSED DOD 13.07.2020

admin_lawsdelhi Jul 14, 2020 0 Comments

Settlement between accused and complainant. Quashing of FIR. Held case registered under Sections 420 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 though the aspect of the settlement between the…

Cr P C

Court held that when the previous conduct of the Petitioner would reveal that he had consistently moved across different countries to avoid arrest, and had eventually to be extradited to India, then the petitioner definitely constituted a flight risk and could not be discharged on bail

admin_lawsdelhi May 31, 2020 0 Comments

In Praveen Kumar @ Prashant v. State of NCT of Delhi, the Court directed criminal prosecution of the Station House Officer of a police station under Section 4(2)(b) of the SC &…

Next Page »

You Missed

CONTEMPT

Accepting Unconditional Apology, Delhi High Court Discharges Arnab Goswami, Others In Contempt Case By Former TERI Chief RK Pachauri

LABOUR & SERVICE MATTERS

Govt Servants Can’t Be Excluded From Protection Of Fundamental Rights: Delhi High Court On Public Servants’ Right To Form Association

CONSTITUTION

Delhi High Court Refuses To Interfere With TRAI’s Recommendation For Rs 1050 Crore Penalty On Vodafone, Says TDSAT Can Decide Issue On Merits

CONSTITUTION

Delhi High Court Directs Malayalam News Portal To Take Down Defamatory Content Published Against Lulu Group Founder MA Yusuff Ali