Skip to content

Delhi High Court Judgements

81130 Judgements Hosted as on 24/08/2023 SEARCH (FREE) READ DOWNLOAD

Delhi High Court Judgements

81130 Judgements Hosted as on 24/08/2023 SEARCH (FREE) READ DOWNLOAD

  • Home
  • Pricing
  • Account
  • About
  • Contact
Cr P C

Court held that when the previous conduct of the Petitioner would reveal that he had consistently moved across different countries to avoid arrest, and had eventually to be extradited to India, then the petitioner definitely constituted a flight risk and could not be discharged on bail

By admin_lawsdelhi May 31, 2020

This content is restricted to site members.

Existing Users Log In
   
Forgot password? Click here to reset
New User? Click here to register

Post navigation

‘This Is The Height of Police Apathy’: Delhi HC Directs Proceedings Against Police Officers For Not Registering FIR On Complaints of Abuse and Harassment of a Dalit Man
‘Completely Unacceptable’ : Delhi HC On District Judge’s Refusal To Accept Bail Bond On Ground That Softy Copy Of HC Order Wasn’t Authenticated HELD Jail Superintendent, Tihar Jail No.7. to release accused on personal bond, in interim .

By admin_lawsdelhi

Login Status

Forgot?  Register

Categories

You Missed

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Evidence By Way Of Affidavit Not Mandatory When Documentary Evidence Sufficient For Determining Well-Known Status Of Trademark

DIRECT TAXATION MUNICIPAL LAWS

DB – services rendered by advocates are professional activities, and, therefore, they cannot be levied with taxes under the “commercial establishment” category

ACCIDENT COMPENSATION RAILWAYS

Inquest proceedings were conducted around 8:55 am on 05.01.2017, which mentions the recovery of a journey ticket dated 04.01.2017 — Mere delay in noticing and reporting the incident by a third party ought to have been appreciated in light of the fact that the incident statedly took place in the month of January – Matter remanded to tribunal for grant of compensation

C P C EVIDENCE ACT

DB – Defamation — Nowhere in the pleadings or in the evidence did the appellant or its witnesses state that the amounts were not due — Respondent’s assertion of there being outstanding amounts which had not been paid by the appellant Company cannot be termed to be false or per se defamatory.

Delhi High Court Judgements

81130 Judgements Hosted as on 24/08/2023 SEARCH (FREE) READ DOWNLOAD

Copyright © All rights reserved