Skip to content

Delhi High Court Judgements

81130 Judgements Hosted as on 24/08/2023 SEARCH (FREE) READ DOWNLOAD

Delhi High Court Judgements

81130 Judgements Hosted as on 24/08/2023 SEARCH (FREE) READ DOWNLOAD

  • Home
  • Pricing
  • Account
  • About
  • Contact
Cr P C

ISHRAT JAHAN case: HELD Public Prosecutor had moved an application, for extension of time to file chargesheet, after going through the whole matrix of the case and after satisfying himself as per the law as enumerated in the second limb of Section 43(D)(2)(b) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. Ld trial Judge also after going through the facts and circumstances and mandate of provisions of law of the Act mentioned and after recording his satisfaction had passed impugned order. Therefore, Court is of view that there is no illegality or perversity in the said order.

By admin_lawsdelhi Jul 31, 2020

This content is restricted to site members.

Existing Users Log In
   
Forgot password? Click here to reset
New User? Click here to register

Post navigation

Petitioner and respondent No.2 have amicably settled their disputes as petitioner and respondent no.2 are real brothers. Per the fact that petitioner is real brother of respondent no.2 (complainant), this Court is inclined to quash FIR
Supreme Court issues notice and orders status quo on Delhi High Court’s order granting bail to Shivinder Singh

By admin_lawsdelhi

Login Status

Forgot?  Register

Categories

You Missed

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Evidence By Way Of Affidavit Not Mandatory When Documentary Evidence Sufficient For Determining Well-Known Status Of Trademark

DIRECT TAXATION MUNICIPAL LAWS

DB – services rendered by advocates are professional activities, and, therefore, they cannot be levied with taxes under the “commercial establishment” category

ACCIDENT COMPENSATION RAILWAYS

Inquest proceedings were conducted around 8:55 am on 05.01.2017, which mentions the recovery of a journey ticket dated 04.01.2017 — Mere delay in noticing and reporting the incident by a third party ought to have been appreciated in light of the fact that the incident statedly took place in the month of January – Matter remanded to tribunal for grant of compensation

C P C EVIDENCE ACT

DB – Defamation — Nowhere in the pleadings or in the evidence did the appellant or its witnesses state that the amounts were not due — Respondent’s assertion of there being outstanding amounts which had not been paid by the appellant Company cannot be termed to be false or per se defamatory.

Delhi High Court Judgements

81130 Judgements Hosted as on 24/08/2023 SEARCH (FREE) READ DOWNLOAD

Copyright © All rights reserved