Skip to content

Delhi High Court Judgements

81130 Judgements Hosted as on 24/08/2023 SEARCH (FREE) READ DOWNLOAD

Delhi High Court Judgements

81130 Judgements Hosted as on 24/08/2023 SEARCH (FREE) READ DOWNLOAD

  • Home
  • Pricing
  • Account
  • About
  • Contact
LAND ACQUISITION

Land Acquisition

admin_lawsdelhi Dec 28, 2019 0 Comments

  Land Acquisition In Sarita Gupta v. MCD the Court held that private landowners cannot be derived of their property by a Municipal Corporation unless the said privately owned land was acquired…

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Intellectual Property Rights

admin_lawsdelhi Dec 26, 2019 0 Comments

Intellectual Property Rights In Mylan Laboratories Limited v. Union of India & Ors., the Court, while considering the scope and ambit of Section 25 of The Patents Act, 1970, (‘Patents Act’) reiterated that no…

LABOUR & SERVICE MATTERS

LABOUR & SERVICE MATTERS

admin_lawsdelhi Dec 24, 2019 0 Comments

Labour and Service Matters In Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd v. Nackchad,  the Court held that even though amendments to a claim statement made by a workman were allowed at a stage…

Posts navigation

1 … 11 12

« Previous Page

Login Status

Forgot?  Register

Categories

You Missed

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Evidence By Way Of Affidavit Not Mandatory When Documentary Evidence Sufficient For Determining Well-Known Status Of Trademark

DIRECT TAXATION MUNICIPAL LAWS

DB – services rendered by advocates are professional activities, and, therefore, they cannot be levied with taxes under the “commercial establishment” category

ACCIDENT COMPENSATION RAILWAYS

Inquest proceedings were conducted around 8:55 am on 05.01.2017, which mentions the recovery of a journey ticket dated 04.01.2017 — Mere delay in noticing and reporting the incident by a third party ought to have been appreciated in light of the fact that the incident statedly took place in the month of January – Matter remanded to tribunal for grant of compensation

C P C EVIDENCE ACT

DB – Defamation — Nowhere in the pleadings or in the evidence did the appellant or its witnesses state that the amounts were not due — Respondent’s assertion of there being outstanding amounts which had not been paid by the appellant Company cannot be termed to be false or per se defamatory.

Delhi High Court Judgements

81130 Judgements Hosted as on 24/08/2023 SEARCH (FREE) READ DOWNLOAD

Copyright © All rights reserved