Cr P C Petitioner and respondent No.2 have amicably settled their disputes as petitioner and respondent no.2 are real brothers. Per the fact that petitioner is real brother of respondent no.2 (complainant), this Court is inclined to quash FIR July 31, 2020 admin_lawsdelhi This content is restricted to site members. If you are an existing user, please log in. New users may register below.Existing Users Log InUsername or EmailPassword Remember Me Forgot password? Click here to resetNew User? Click here to register Related Posts Cr P C Supreme Court issues notice and orders status quo on Delhi High Court’s order granting bail to Shivinder Singh August 1, 2020 admin_lawsdelhi Cr P C ISHRAT JAHAN case: HELD Public Prosecutor had moved an application, for extension of time to file chargesheet, after going through the whole matrix of the case and after satisfying himself as per the law as enumerated in the second limb of Section 43(D)(2)(b) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. Ld trial Judge also after going through the facts and circumstances and mandate of provisions of law of the Act mentioned and after recording his satisfaction had passed impugned order. Therefore, Court is of view that there is no illegality or perversity in the said order. July 31, 2020August 3, 2020 admin_lawsdelhi
