Skip to content
Delhi High Court Judgements
81130 Judgements Hosted as on 24/08/2023 SEARCH (FREE) READ DOWNLOAD
Delhi High Court Judgements
81130 Judgements Hosted as on 24/08/2023 SEARCH (FREE) READ DOWNLOAD
Home
Pricing
Account
About
Contact
Home
Reset Forgotten Password
Username or Email
Forgot username?
Click here
You Missed
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Evidence By Way Of Affidavit Not Mandatory When Documentary Evidence Sufficient For Determining Well-Known Status Of Trademark
DIRECT TAXATION
MUNICIPAL LAWS
DB – services rendered by advocates are professional activities, and, therefore, they cannot be levied with taxes under the “commercial establishment” category
ACCIDENT
COMPENSATION
RAILWAYS
Inquest proceedings were conducted around 8:55 am on 05.01.2017, which mentions the recovery of a journey ticket dated 04.01.2017 — Mere delay in noticing and reporting the incident by a third party ought to have been appreciated in light of the fact that the incident statedly took place in the month of January – Matter remanded to tribunal for grant of compensation
C P C
EVIDENCE ACT
DB – Defamation — Nowhere in the pleadings or in the evidence did the appellant or its witnesses state that the amounts were not due — Respondent’s assertion of there being outstanding amounts which had not been paid by the appellant Company cannot be termed to be false or per se defamatory.
Search for: